Legal Opinion
Randazza v. Cox
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 11, 2013No. Case No. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PALPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1154ORDER
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF # 2) filed by Plaintiffs Marc J. Randazza, Jennifer Randazza, and Natalia Randazza (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). Also before the Court are Defendant Cox’s Motion for Judges and Clerks to Sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure (ECF # 19), Defendant Cox’s Motion for Judge Gloria Navarro’s Recusal (ECF #20), and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant Cox’s Fugitive Surreply to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF #31).
I.BACKGROUND
The Complaint brought before the Court involves…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zinner v. OlenychDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Guardado v. DzurendaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- deltaventure GmbH v. Pay.ioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020