Legal Opinion
Diel v. Baxter
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1943No. Civ. No. 3072PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
For some time prior to May 15, 1938, defendants and appellants owned a soda bottling works at 808 R Street in Fresno. Immediately to the rear of the bottling works but facing on S Street at No. 817 was erected a garage or storehouse which was used in storing empty bottles and cases. The business was operated under the name of Ideal Bottling Works. About three months prior to May 15, 1938, respondent commenced negotiations with appellants for the purchase of the business. In furtherance of these negotiations, on May 20,1938, there was brought to John K. Baxter a document called an option to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Kenney v. Los Feliz Investment Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- United States Farm Land Co. v. DarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Perry v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- James v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Redfoot v. J. T. Jenkins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Dicker v. BisnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957