Legal Opinion

Dicker v. Bisno

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1957No. Civ. 22140PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants Alexander Bisno and Combined Television Pictures, Inc. (formerly known as Snader Telescriptions Sales, Inc.) for services rendered; and from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and counter-defendant and against the defendant and counterclaimant Alexander Bisno upon a counterclaim.

The plaintiff Dicker is an attorney-at-law. For many years he represented Alexander Bisno in connection with Bisno’s real estate transactions. Dicker was on a monthly retainer basis and was paid added amounts when extraordinary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Johnson v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. McCarthy v. Mt. Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Golden Hill Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. House v. MoomawOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Burton v. Santa Barbara Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API