Legal Opinion
Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1985No. C6-85-295PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Deborah Kanar appeals from a district court order overturning a finding made by the St. Paul Human Rights Commission that Pearson Candy Company unlawfully discriminated against her under St. Paul, Minn., Legis.Code ch. 183 (1983).
FACTS
On June 12, 1983, Deborah Kanar (Ka-nar), hired through Personnel Pool, a temporary agency, began work on Pearson Candy Company’s (Pearson) assembly line as a wrapper/packer/feeder (“w/p/f”). After a short term of temporary employment, Pearson asked Kanar whether she would be willing to apply for permanent employment. Kanar indicated that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lewis Ex Rel. Welles v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Lewis v. Remmele Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In re 1984 Pine County Attorney BudgetCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen Ex Rel. KanarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986