Legal Opinion
In re 1984 Pine County Attorney Budget
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1985No. C5-84-1489PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The Pine County attorney appealed the salary set by the county board for himself and his assistant for 1984. The district court ruled that while the board’s actions were not arbitrary or capricious, the board had not adequately considered the duties and responsibilities of the office. The court made a finding that any salary below $40,000 for the county attorney or $25,000 for the assistant county attorney would be unreasonable, and ordered that the matter be remanded to the board for further action consistent with the findings. The county board appealed. We affirm in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Amdahl v. County of FillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Stensland v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Opheim v. County of NormanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Pearson Candy Co. v. HuyenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Ross Arneson v. Blue Earth County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014