Buell v. Livingston Oil Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
■ The plaintiff commenced its action against the defendants for conversion of two oil rigs of the j on sonable valuation of $2,000. In the trial of the causo the jury returned its verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1,200. The defendants have brought error to this court and seek a reversal of the cause, urging (a) that the court committed error in its instructions to the jury; (b) that the verdict of the jury is excessive.
We have carefully examine l 'the instructions submitting the issues of fact between the parties to' the jury, and ibid that all quest1'ons of fact…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Danciger v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Arkansas Valley & Western Railway Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Lusk v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.