Legal Opinion

Buell v. Livingston Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1923No. 12501Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

■ The plaintiff commenced its action against the defendants for conversion of two oil rigs of the j on sonable valuation of $2,000. In the trial of the causo the jury returned its verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1,200. The defendants have brought error to this court and seek a reversal of the cause, urging (a) that the court committed error in its instructions to the jury; (b) that the verdict of the jury is excessive.

We have carefully examine l 'the instructions submitting the issues of fact between the parties to' the jury, and ibid that all quest1'ons of fact…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Danciger v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Arkansas Valley & Western Railway Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Lusk v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API