Legal Opinion

Braden v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court. — Hon. Arch B. Davis, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON,. J.

Plaintiff, a farmer, was employed by a section foreman of defendant in August, 1910, to cut weeds and grass on defendant’s right of way for a distance of about three-quarters of a mile west from Utica station. He -was to use his team and mowing machine where it was practicable and' to cut the re*585mainder by band. One of the section men accompanied him. After working with his machine until near the close of the first day, one of the horses fell into a ditch on the right of way and was so injured that he had to be killed.

Plaintiff sued in a justice court to recover the value of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Post v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. American Creosoting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Schabbing ex rel. Mayberry v. SeabaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Piorkowski v. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Baker v. LuskMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API