Legal Opinion

Baker v. Lusk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Pemiscoj; Circuit Court. — Now. Sterling H. McCarty, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants on account of personal injuries sustained while working as a section hand on defendant’s*right-of-way repairing the railroad track, and defendants have appealed.

The charge of negligence is that the defendants failed to exercise ordinary care in furnishing plaintiff with a reasonably safe place in which to work.

The facts are that defendants had prior to the ’time of the injury scattered along the right-of-way in the country some railroad ties, having thrown them down the embankment some ten or fifteen feet from the rails. They also had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Badgley v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Nugent v. Kauffman Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Roberts v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Williams v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Wilt v. CoughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wiser v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Meeker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API