Baker v. Lusk
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Pemiscoj; Circuit Court. — Now. Sterling H. McCarty, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants on account of personal injuries sustained while working as a section hand on defendant’s*right-of-way repairing the railroad track, and defendants have appealed.
The charge of negligence is that the defendants failed to exercise ordinary care in furnishing plaintiff with a reasonably safe place in which to work.
The facts are that defendants had prior to the ’time of the injury scattered along the right-of-way in the country some railroad ties, having thrown them down the embankment some ten or fifteen feet from the rails. They also had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Badgley v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Nugent v. Kauffman Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Roberts v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Williams v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Wilt v. CoughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wiser v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Meeker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923