Legal Opinion

Kerens Nat. Bank v. Stockton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1926No. 6913. [fn*]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The Kerens National Bank, hereinafter designated appellant bank, sued W. T. Stockton, individually, and as independent executor of the estate of L. M. Morris, deceased, to recover a balance of an indebtedness of $2,604.65 alleged to be due on a note or notes originally executed by' Morris during his lifetime, and afterwards renewed by his said executor, and to foreclose an alleged creditor’s lien on the property comprising Morris’ estate. Appellant bank also sued to cancel and set aside a certain judgment rendered by the district court of. Navarro county, Tex., on August 10, 1921, in cause…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Splawn v. ChewTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Avery v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Brooks v. ChathamTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Stone v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kelley v. BarnhillTexas Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerens National Bank v. StocktonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Delevan v. ThomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Kerens National Bank v. StocktonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kerens Nat. Bank v. StocktonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API