Legal Opinion

Brient v. Bruce

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1893No. 127PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. W. W. King.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

Appellees sued for land, claiming title, as they allege, to a part of original city lot number 11, range 1, district 3, of the plan of city lands of San Antonio, it being subdivision 3 thereof, as shown by a plat of the subdivision of said lot, 1 ‘ attached to and made a part of a deed dated July 25, 1889, from Joseph Layer and Elizabeth Layer to Katie and Otto I-Iilgers, of record in Bexar County, to which reference is made for further and other particulars. Said subdivision number 3 has a front of 303 feet on a street to be known as Layer Street, and extends back…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ZimmermanTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Smith v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Burnett v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crosson v. DwyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Houston Packing Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Whitmore v. McNallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API