Legal Opinion

Permian Oil Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1932No. 2559PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*501Statement of Case.

HIGGINS, J.

This suit was instituted June 21, 1928, by plaintiff in error against the defendants in error to recover section 103, in block 194, Texas Central Ry. Co. survey in Pepos county, containing 407 acres, and to recover the value of oil produced from the land to the date of trial. i

Por convenience the parties will be -designated as they were in the trial court.

In the amended petition the land is described as follows:

“Sec. 103, Block 194, T. C. Ry. Co. Original Grantee, situated in Pecos County, Texas, •described as follows: Beginning at a stk and md at the N. E. Cor of…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Freeman v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam-Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of Texas and New Idria Mining & Chemical Company v. J. W. Marshall, D/B/A Marshall Pipe & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Hoffmann v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Bingham v. BolesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Lower Payette Ditch Co. v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API