Christopher v. Christopher
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceBryan, Judge
I agree with the main opinion and I agree with the sentiments expressed by Judge Thomas in her special writing. I write specially to note my agreement with the following reasoning and sentiments expressed by Chief Justice Moore in his special writing in Ex parte Tabor, 840 So.2d 115, 123 (Ala.2002), regarding the constitutionality of Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986 (Ala.1989):
“[Wjhat the [Bayliss ] Court ultimately perceived to be ‘just and reasonable,’ guided by ‘conscience and the feeling of justice,’ did not justify a departure from the rightful role of judges so eloquently enunciated by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Curtis v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Ex Parte BaylissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Northcutt v. ClevelandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Ex Parte TaborSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.