Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Kline

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1995PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

In Blue v. Blue, 532 Pa. 521, 616 A.2d 628 (1992), we declined to recognize a duty requiring a parent to provide college educational support because no such legal duty had been imposed by the General Assembly or developed by our case law. As a result of our Blue decision, the legislature promulgated Act 62 of 1993. Section 3 of the Act states:(a) General rule.— ... a court may order either or both parents who are separated, divorced, unmarried or otherwise subject to an existing support obligation to provide equitably for educational costs of their child whether an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. MockaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Clifton v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. GroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API