Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 2009No. 03CR1988, A124651PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, which vacated our prior decision, State v. Mitchell, 206 Or App 586, 138 P3d 60 (2006), in light of State v. Ramirez, 343 Or 505, 173 P3d 817 (2007), adh’d to as modified on recons, 344 Or 195, 179 P3d 673 (2008), and State v. Fults, 343 Or 515, 173 P3d 822 (2007). State v. Mitchell, 345 Or 175, 190 P3d 1237 (2008). In Mitchell I, we vacated defendant’s sentences and remanded for resentencing because the trial court had imposed departure sentences based on judicial findings that defendant was persistently involved in similar offenses.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ROBERTSON (A122733)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API