Legal Opinion
United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1976No. 75-2207 and 75-2279PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. JAMESON, Senior District Judge:
In a non-jury trial appellants were convicted of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and fraud by wire in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, through the use of an electronic device which enabled them to reroute long distance telephone calls and avoid being billed for the services. 1 We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Telephone Company Investigation
Walter P. Schmidt is a special agent for General Telephone Company with substantial training in electronics. Since the mid 1960s he has worked…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Karyn Rene Walther, United States of America v. Graciela Barba-BarbaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. OlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jerry Diggs, United States of America v. Peter OliverezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Richard Norton Sherwin, Dba Marquis Publishing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.