Legal Opinion

United States v. Jerry Diggs, United States of America v. Peter Oliverez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1981No. 79-1741, 79-1753PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRASK, Circuit Judge:

This is a consolidation of two criminal appeals. Appellants Diggs and Oliverez were each indicted on two counts of mail and wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1341, 1343. A jury found them guilty on all counts. Appellants make various assignments of error relating to the admissibility of certain evidence, the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury verdict, and the district court’s denial of several defense motions. We affirm.

I

Appellants’ fraudulent scheme involved the issuance of negotiable paper — e. g.,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Leslie Fleishman, United States of America v. Peter Combs, United States of America v. Stephen GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API