Legal Opinion

Marriage of Impola v. Impola

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1990No. CX-90-1075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

In October, 1989, appellant Traci Inez Impola commenced action in St. Louis District Court to dissolve her marriage to respondent Mark Adam Impola. Appellant moved the trial court for temporary custody and child support. The trial court granted appellant temporary custody but denied her motion for temporary child support, indicating it lacked personal jurisdiction over respondent to determine the issue. Appellant contends the trial court has jurisdiction by virtue of the long-arm statute and her husband’s numerous minimum contacts with the State of Minnesota. 1 We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Dent-Air, Inc. v. Beech Mountain Air Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Vikse v. FlabySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe 1-22 v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of: Maria Suljic v. Ibrahim SuljicCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API