Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Myers

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1985No. Docket 77854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right from a jury verdict and judgment awarding plaintiff $125,000 for work loss in excess of the 3-year limitation contained in the personal protection provisions of the no-fault act, MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135.

On appeal, defendant first argues that reversal is required because the jury’s conclusion that plaintiff suffered work loss under MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135 is factually inconsistent with the jury’s concurrent finding that plaintiff had not suffered a serious impairment of body function pursuant to the same statutory provision. We disagree. The Legislature…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gorelick v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Deeb v. BerriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cochran v. MyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Clark v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API