Cochran v. Myers
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from a jury verdict and judgment awarding plaintiff $125,000 for work loss in excess of the 3-year limitation contained in the personal protection provisions of the no-fault act, MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135.
On appeal, defendant first argues that reversal is required because the jury’s conclusion that plaintiff suffered work loss under MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135 is factually inconsistent with the jury’s concurrent finding that plaintiff had not suffered a serious impairment of body function pursuant to the same statutory provision. We disagree. The Legislature…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Gorelick v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Deeb v. BerriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cochran v. MyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Clark v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986