Legal Opinion

Clark v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1986No. Docket 82072PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this no-fault action the trial court granted summary judgment in defendants’ favor, GCR 1963, 117.2(1) and (3), now MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10), having concluded that plaintiff Roy Clark did not suffer a serious impairment of a body function and that plaintiff could not recover for loss of earning capacity without meeting that no-fault threshold, MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135. Plaintiffs appeal as of right and we affirm. The trial court also permitted plaintiff to amend the complaint to seek excess work loss, MCL 500.3135(2)(c); MSA 24.13135(2)(c), concluding that such damages may be recovered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Ouellette v. KenealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Flemings v. JenkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Beard v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API