Clark v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this no-fault action the trial court granted summary judgment in defendants’ favor, GCR 1963, 117.2(1) and (3), now MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10), having concluded that plaintiff Roy Clark did not suffer a serious impairment of a body function and that plaintiff could not recover for loss of earning capacity without meeting that no-fault threshold, MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135. Plaintiffs appeal as of right and we affirm. The trial court also permitted plaintiff to amend the complaint to seek excess work loss, MCL 500.3135(2)(c); MSA 24.13135(2)(c), concluding that such damages may be recovered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ouellette v. KenealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Flemings v. JenkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Beard v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986