Legal Opinion
Kleindienst v. Jordan
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1963No. 7697PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus by A. R. Kleindienst, Henry R. Larson and C. Lawrence Huerta, duly appointed Industrial Commissioners of Arizona to compel Jewel Jordan, State Auditor, to honor salary claims authorized by Section 29, Chapter 98, Laws of Arizona 1962. Chapter 98 in general provides for salary increases for various state employees including the Governor and Attorney General.
The basic problem to be resolved is whether the salary increase authorized by the legislature may be properly claimed by Commissioner Huerta for if he can claim the increase…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- County of Yuma v. SturgesArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Reuss v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Lancaster v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Clark v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Bland v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Hoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984