Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 5, 1946No. 15,759PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Effective July 2, 1945, the legislature passed an act reclassifying counties and thereby providing increased salary for county officers. S.L. ’45, c. 125. Plaintiffs occupy offices in Jefferson county, affected by the act. All except plaintiff Lancaster had been elected and their terms had begun prior to the passage of the act. Lancaster was appointed subsequently to fill a vacancy caused by resignation of the county treasurer. This action was brought for determination of the rights of plaintiffs to the increased salary provided for in the act, and the district court held that the act could…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bashford v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Carter v. State Ex Rel. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Hovey v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Blakeley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Shubat v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ballangee v. Board of the County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Tisdel v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Comptroller of the State v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API