Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Reuss v. Giessel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1952PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Sec. 26, art. IV, Wisconsin constitution, reads:
“The legislature shall never grant any extra conpensation to any public officer, agent, servant, or contractor, after the services shall have”been rendered or the contract entered into; nor shall the compensation of any public officer be increased or diminished during his term of office.”
The act involved must be presumed valid unless its repugnance to this section of the constitution is clear and irreconcilable. This court may not judge the wisdom of the policy sought to be implemented by the enactment.
“And it is equally clear that if the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Kearney v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. Klefisch v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Sachtjen v. FestgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Moses Ex Rel. Moses v. Board of Veterans AffairsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Sonneborn v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Kleindienst v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.