Apache State Bank v. Voight
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Caddo County; C. R. Johnston, Judge. Action by the Apache State Bank against William Voight. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
EDWARDS, C.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, in the county court of Caddo county, on August 8, 1914, to recover judgment upon a promissory note in the sum of $150, with interest at 10 per cent, from June 10, 1914, and $15 attorney’s fees. The defendant, for answer, admitted the execution of the note, but set up as a defense certain alleged fraudulent representations by which the note was procured. Upon the issue framed a trial was had to a jury, and a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant in error, defendant below. Within due time the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Model Clothing Co. v. First Nat. Bank of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Musser Et Ux. v. Baker, County Judge of Blaine CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. MarchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Pine v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Edwards v. TwineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Skirvin v. SiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938