Legal Opinion

Furst & Furst v. Freels

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 14, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaw, P. J.

The complainants, Geo. Furst and Toby Furst, partners under the name and style of Furst & Furst, brought this suit in the chancery court of Hamblen County, on March 10, 1924, seeking to recover a judgment against J. C. Freels upon a “trade acceptance” for $102.60, with protest fees. The case was finally heard by the Chancellor on bill, answer and proof, and a decree was entered (on November 16, 1926) by which the Chancellor granted a recovery in favor of complainants and against defendant for the amount of the trade acceptance sued on, $102.60, together with the sum of $10.99 interest thereon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Knoxville Water Co. v. East Tennessee National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Elgin City Banking Co. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ingle System Co. v. NorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson Bros. v. Harpeth National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  2. Smith v. PrichardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Union Nat. Bank v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  4. Lindsey v. Planters Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  5. Norbert Trading Co. v. UnderwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API