Legal Opinion

Norbert Trading Co. v. Underwood

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1952Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The respondent, Norbert Trading Company, Inc., brought suit against the petitioner, the maker of a negotiable note, on said note. The petitioner entered a plea of non-assignavit. The Chancellor sustained this plea because the complainant- had not proven the assignment of the note to it. The original complainant appealed and the Court of Appeals reversed and entered judgment on the note. Two judges of that court concurred in the result but reached this result through entirely different reasons. The third judge dissented. We have granted certiorari and heard argument and the case is now before…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wagner Trading Co. v. Battery Park National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Jones v. StoddartIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Warren v. Littleton Orange Crush Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Dodo v. StockerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Citizens State Bank v. SkeffingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API