Legal Opinion

Arzola v. Name Intelligence, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 26, 2012No. 66752-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 — In Washington, under chapter 49.52 RCW, employers that willfully fail to pay employees any part of their wages are liable to the employees for exemplary damages of twice the amount of wages wrongfully *53withheld, as well as attorney fees and costs. We are asked to determine whether consideration owed to employees under stock right cancellation agreements constituted “wages,” as that term is used in chapter 49.52 RCW, and whether the employees are entitled to exemplary damages. Because the payments under the agreements were not for the employees’ services or labor, but were for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. TrulockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. Morgan v. KingenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Morgan v. KingenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Durand v. HIMC CORP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Dice v. City of MontesanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arzola v. Name Intelligence, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Atm Shafiqul Khalid And Xencare Software, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Citrix Systems, Inc. v. Atm Shafiqul Khalid And Xencare Software, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Gustavo Nelson Arzola, / Cross-res. v. Name Intelligence, Inc., / Cross-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Gustavo Nelson Arzola, / Cross-res. v. Name Intelligence, Inc., / Cross-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API