Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Kingen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2009No. 81202-1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 — This case asks us to determine whether financial status, specifically bankruptcy under chapter 7 liquidation, is a valid defense to negate the finding of a willful failure to pay wages owed to employees. RCW 49.52.050 and RCW 49.52.070 respectively set out the criminal and civil penalty mandated where any employer or officer, vice principal, or agent of any employer willfully and with intent deprives the employee of any part of his or her wages. In Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc., 136 Wn.2d 152, 961 P.2d 371 (1998), we held financial status does not negate a finding of willfulness.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Gander v. YeagerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. 224 Westlake, LLC v. Engstrom Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Durand v. HIMC CORP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API