Legal Opinion

Dice v. City of Montesano

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 22, 2006No. 32407-5-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*680¶1

Van Deren, A.C.J.

— The city of Montesano (City) appeals the trial court’s decision awarding City employee Clint Dice three months’ severance pay and attorney fees under his employment contract with the City. It argues that the trial court (1) did not give effect to the contract’s plain meaning, (2) erred when it ruled severance pay constituted salary or wages under RCW 49.48.030, and (3) did not properly segregate its legal fee award. Dice cross-appeals, claiming the court erred when it did not grant him double damages and all his requested attorney fees, including those for discovery and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hume v. American Disposal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & LightWashington Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Durand v. HIMC CORP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Modular Mining System, Inc. v. Jigsaw Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Durand v. HIMC Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Realm, Inc. v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. O'Neill v. City of ShorelineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API