Grady v. Commers Interiors, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Chief Justice.
This is a contract action in which the plaintiff alleges that the defendant breached a contract for carpet installation which had been assigned to the plaintiff. The defendant relies on a contract provision forbidding assignment of the contract unless written consent is obtained from the defendant. The Circuit Court for the Fourth Judicial Circuit, sitting without a jury, found for the defendant. We reverse the judgment and remand for the purpose of making further findings.
On February 9,1972, the defendant, Com-mers Interiors, Inc., entered into a contract with Paul…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Bottum v. HerrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Des Moines Blue Ribbon Distributors, Inc. v. Drewrys Ltd. U. S. A.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Watt v. WattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Ford v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Sioux Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Jones CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.