Legal Opinion

Grady v. Commers Interiors, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1978No. 12253PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Chief Justice.

This is a contract action in which the plaintiff alleges that the defendant breached a contract for carpet installation which had been assigned to the plaintiff. The defendant relies on a contract provision forbidding assignment of the contract unless written consent is obtained from the defendant. The Circuit Court for the Fourth Judicial Circuit, sitting without a jury, found for the defendant. We reverse the judgment and remand for the purpose of making further findings.

On February 9,1972, the defendant, Com-mers Interiors, Inc., entered into a contract with Paul…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bottum v. HerrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Des Moines Blue Ribbon Distributors, Inc. v. Drewrys Ltd. U. S. A.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Watt v. WattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ford v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  5. Sioux Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Jones CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API