Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Nicholas
Indiana Supreme Court
From Henry Circuit Court; J ohn M. Morris, Judge. Action by Howard E. Fichólas against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Kailway Company. From a judgment of the Appellate Court affirming a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals under subd. 3, §1337j Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Appellee brought this action for damages resulting from a personal injury received while in the employ of the appellant as a brakeman, and recovered a judgment of $7,500. This judgment was affirmed by division number one of the Appellate Court, and from that division this appeal is prosecuted.
*681By proper assignment of errors it is alleged in substance that the decision of the Appellate Court is erroneous in bolding that tbe circuit court did not err in overruling (1) appellant’s demurrer to tbe complaint, (2) its motion for judgment upon tbe answers of tbe jury to special interrogatories, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Taylor v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- American Rolling Mill Co. v. HullingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Thacker v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Woodward Iron Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- New Albany National Bank v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Posey County v. ChamnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. KaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.