Legal Opinion
Nath v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2006No. 05-16557PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Narayan Prasad Nath, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen. The BIA upheld an Order of Removal or deportation against Nath under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) (“Any alien who is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission is deportable.”). In his motion to reopen, Nath asserted that his conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11378 for possession of a controlled substance for sale was vacated, and that the vacated conviction cannot serve as the basis of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Alvarez-Barajas v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Rahmatullah Afridi v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales , Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Nehad v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Hardeep Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Poblete Mendoza v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Bunty Ngaeth v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Bent v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.