Legal Opinion
Fleischer v. A.A.P., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 25, 1958PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
I
The decisive question raised by plaintiff’s motion for an injunction against defendants’ attorneys is: Are the issues and subject-matter of the present lawsuit “substantially related” to the issues and subjects of other and prior litigation and legal matters in which the attorneys now representing three of the defendants herein formerly represented the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s interests and associates during the years 1929 to 1940?
The plaintiff, Dave Fleischer, suing individually and as trustee in dissolution of Fleischer Studios Incorporated (a Florida…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- United States v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Laskey Bros. Of W. Va., Inc. v. Warner Bros, Pictures, Inc. (In Dissolution), Austin Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. (In Dissolution)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Gulf Oil Corporation, and United Nuclear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.