United States v. Johnson
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
McCOLLOCH, District Judge.
There is more involved here than just the individual defendant’s welfare.
Here is a colored man who was brought out from Washington, clear across the country, to work in war industry. He was brought here in 1943 by the Kaiser people and stayed on the job faithfully, so far as we know, until 1945, March of this year,' worked for the Kaiser people all the time and sent half of his wages back regularly, until he lost his employment. He didn’t bring his family with him, and now that the war has ended he has not kept up their support. So these criminal proceedings for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Tinsley v. TreatSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States Ex Rel. Hughes v. GaultSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States Ex Rel. Kassin v. MulliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. ParkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1954
- O. L. Dailey, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Authority for the Removal of Fugitive Felons Apprehended Under 18 U.S.C. § 1073, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1983