Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Okmulgee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1935No. 23853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in error will be referred io as plaintiffs and defendant in error will be referred to as defendant, the order in which they appeared in the trial court.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs against the defendant for damages alleged to have been caused by acts of defendant during the time plaintiffs were constructing a dam for defendant under a written contract.

The plaintiffs set out general allegations in their second amended petition and seven distinct causes of action. The defendant filed a demurrer to each separate cause of action, and set out as the ground for each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Robertson v. VandeventerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Gibson v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Holt v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Murray v. Link Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Hammer v. Old American Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API