Legal Opinion

State v. Hernandez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 2001No. 21,119, 21,120PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

{1} This case presents an issue of first impression in New Mexico: Whether the offense/conviction chronological sequence required by State v. Linam, 93 N.M. 307, 600 P.2d 253 (1979) and Koonsman v. State, 116 N.M. 112, 860 P.2d 754 (1993) for imposition of habitual offender penalties applies to drunk driving sentencing under NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102(E), (F), (G) (1999). We hold that it does not, and affirm Defendant’s sentence and judgment as a fourth degree felony pursuant to Section 66-8-102(G).

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

{2} There is no conflict concerning the operative…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. DiazNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. CalvertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API