Legal Opinion
Stansberry v. Manson
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1966No. 680PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before NESBETT, C. J., and DIMOND and RABINOWITZ, JJ. DIMOND, Justice.
Appellant entered into an oral employment agreement with appellee, whereby ap-pellee agreed to help part time in the construction of appellant’s building. The parties do not dispute that appellee was to be paid at the rate of $7.00 an hour. They are in dispute, however, on two main points: (1) as to the number of hours that appellee worked, and (2) as to the time when appellee was to be paid for his services.
Regarding the first point, the trial court found that appellee had worked a total of 312 hours, as he had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Thos. J. Dyer Company v. Bishop International Engineering Company and General Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Parks v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Crume v. CrumeAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Horton v. HansenAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Ware v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.