Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Chariton County.— lion. Fred Lamb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, P. J.

This suit was instituted June 3, 1919, to recover the $300 statutory penalty provided by section 3330, Revised Statutes 1909 (now Sec. 10, 136, R. S. 1919), for failure to promptly deliver a telegram alleged to have been sent by plaintiff from St. Louis, Missouri, to Keytesville, 'Missouri, on the 6th day of April, 1919.

The answer was a general denial, and it further set up as a defense that at the time the telegram was filed for transmission defendant was not in control and operation of its telegraph system, but that the same had been taken over, and was being operated, by the United States…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Jenkins v. CollardSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Spring v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CondittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Mitchell v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Preston v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Shannon County Ex Rel. Winona Consolidated School District v. Shannon County BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API