Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 21, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the- Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

The appellant and plaintiff below, Parker Mitchell, an infant, by his statutory guardian, filed this suit in the *264court below against appellee and defendant, Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company, seeking to recover from defendant the sum of $15,0000.00, for personal injuries which plaintiff sustained while in -the employ of the defendant, and which he claims were produced by the negligence of the defendant, its agents and servants superior to him. By an amended petition it was alleged that the American Telephone & Telegraph Company claimed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Burleson v. DempcySupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. PostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. American Railway Express Co. v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. McFeena's Admr. v. Paris Home Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HaverlyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API