Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 29, 2007No. Docket 04-6665-prPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:

The Supreme Court has vacated our decision in this habeas proceeding with the instruction to reconsider it in light of Carey v. Musladin, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 649, 166 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006).

Relying on our own well-settled precedent and what we conceived to be the teachings of the high court, we had held that the New York State Courts had unreasonably applied “clearly established” Sixth Amendment law in excluding Jose Rodriguez’s family from his criminal trial. Accordingly, we remanded the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ZonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. House v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Garson v. PerlmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. Bumpus v. Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  5. Goldberg v. TracyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API