Legal Opinion

In Re Midland Credit Management, Inc.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 11, 2011No. MDL No. 1358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, defendants Encore Capital Group, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC, and Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Midland) move for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of four actions split between two districts as listed on Schedule A. Defendants seek centralization in the Southern District of California. Plaintiff in one Southern District of California action (Tovar) supports the motion.

Plaintiff in one Northern District of Illinois action (Scardina) supports centralization but suggests the Northern…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Telephone Consumer Protection Act LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In re Enhanced Recovery Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  3. In re Convergent Telephone Consumer Protection Act LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  4. In re Collecto, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  5. In re Monitronics International, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API