Legal Opinion
Nevinnomysskiy Azot v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 9, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-64; Court 06-00013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
This case concerns the court’s remand to the U.S. International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) of its second sunset review determination regarding solid urea from Russia and Ukraine. The court affirmed several of the Commission’s specific findings, but remanded to allow the Commission to provide a more reasoned analysis of (1) the impact of third-country barriers on urea exports, (2) the impact of non-subject imports on domestic pricing, and (3) certain conditions of competition in the industry. The Commission issued its remand determination on November 26, 2007.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nsk Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Swiff-Train Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Awp Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011