Legal Opinion

Moore v. Twin City Ice & Cold Storage Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1916No. 12942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Benton county, Holcomb, J., entered January 7, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to forfeit a lease and for damages, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff for the purpose of securing the forfeiture of a lease of real estate, for possession of such real estate, and for damages on account of waste claimed to have been caused by the defendant as tenant. After the action had been pending for some time, a supplemental complaint was filed claiming, as an- additional ground for forfeiture, the failure to pay rent which had become due subsequent to the time when suit was begun. After the issues were framed, the cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment decreeing the forfeiture of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Davenport v. MagoonOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Walsh v. ColvinWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hidden v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Graffell v. HoneysuckleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Gaunt v. Alabama Bound Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  5. Rupard v. ReesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API