State v. Steptoe
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Criminal Court. •cited: State v. Jennings, 36 Mo. 372; State v. Davidson, •38 Mo. 374; State v. Farrar, 38 Mo. 457. cited:: Wag. Stat. 1107; State v. Matrassey, 47 Mo. 295.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree, upon an indictment against him alone. It appeared from the testimony that the crime was perpetrated by the •defendant jointly with one Simon Coen,' against whom a separate charge for the same offense was prosecuted in the ■Court of Criminal Correction. Upon these facts the defendant moved to quash the indictment, under color of the following statutory provision: “ When two or more persons are charged with having committed an offense jointly, all concerned shall be included in one indictment.” Wag. Stat. 1089, sec. 20. The defendant’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MatrasseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- State v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Acton v. DooleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Grammer v. Wiggins-Meyer Steamship Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Hary v. SpeerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.