Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Howard

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacrar mentó County. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and the defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Crocker,, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court—Norton, J. concurring.

This is an-action to recover the possession of a lot in the town of Folsom. The plaintiff claims title under a tax deed, executed by the Sheriff, in pursuance of a sale under an execution issued out of the District Court, upon a judgment for taxes, rendered in a Justice’s Court by default. The judgment was rendered, and the proceedings had, under and in pursuance of a statute of this State, entitled “ An Act to provide for the collection of Delinquent *403Taxes in the City and County of Sacramento,” approved April 3d, 1860.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alderson v. Bell & WifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Joyce v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Swain v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Lewes v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Mills v. TukeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Kane v. DesmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API