Legal Opinion
Zunum Aero Inc v. The Boeing Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 12, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00896Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 ZUNUM AERO, INC., CASE NO. C21-0896JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 THE BOEING COMPANY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendants The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) and Boeing 17 HorizonX Ventures, LLC’s (“HorizonX”) (collectively, “Boeing”) partial motion to 18 dismiss Plaintiff Zunum Aero, Inc.’s (“Zunum”) second amended complaint (“SAC”). 19 (Mot. (Dkt. # 62); Reply (Dkt. # 66).1) Zunum opposes the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 63).) 20 The court has considered the parties’…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.