White v. Davidson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore city. Assumpsit by the appellant against the appellees. The nar contains the usual money and insimul computassent counts. Plea, non assumpsit.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore city. Assumpsit by the appellant against the appellees. The nar contains the usual money and insimul computassent counts. Plea, non assumpsit. A bill of particulars was furnished on demand, stating that plaintiff’s claim is founded on a 'icritten promise to indemnify him if he would become security of Henry Carter in an injunction bond to James M. Carlisle and others, dated the 22nd of June 1846, made to plaintiff by Joseph H. Bradley, the solicitor and agent of defendants, and by authority of defendants to Bradley, and is accompanied by particular…
1Opinion of the CourtLe Grand, C. J.
The record in this case shows the following state of facts: A mercantile firm, under the style and name of Carter &. Washington, in the city of Washington, D. C., were indebted to merchants in the city of Baltimore. Washington, by transfer, as it was alleged, had conveyed the joint assets to secure the payment of his own debts to the exclusion of those of his partner, Garter. The creditors of both, in the city of Baltimore, being desirous of having the property appropriated to the payment of the debts of the firm, appointed a committee in the following words, to superintend and guard their…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Maddux v. BevanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Howard v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Posko v. Climatic Control Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Thompson v. Laboringman's Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Accrocco v. SplawnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.