Legal Opinion

State v. . Etheridge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeax by defendant from Ferguson, J., at September Term, 1914, of Edgecombe.

1Opinion of the Court

‘Waxkeb, J.

Tbe defendants were indicted, under Revisal, see. 3365, for enticing one Frank Battle, a servant, to leave bis master, wbo, it is alleged, was J. R. Bunting, tbe prosecutor. It will be necessary to consider only one exception of tbe defendants, wbo were convicted below, and appealed. They contend tbat tbe evidence showed tbat Frank Battle was not a servant, but either a tenant or a cropper, and if either, they are not indictable, even if it is true tbat they bad induced bim to leave bis alleged employer. As we are of tbe opinion tbat tbe position is well taken, tbat Frank Battle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. State v. . HooverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Barron v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Minton v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Moss v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API