Legal Opinion

Moss v. Hicks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1954No. 96PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Did the trial court err in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint ? This is the question presented on this appeal. And upon it arises the basic question as to whether the relation between plaintiff and defendant is that of landlord and tenant, or of master and servant. Plaintiff contends for the latter. But the decisions of this Court, and the Landlord and Tenant Act, Chap. 42 of tbe General Statutes, lead to the conclusion that the relation is that of landlord and tenant. See among other cases Pleasants v. Barnes, 221 N.C. 173, 19 S.E. 2d 627, which cites S. v. Hoover, 107 N.C. 795, 12…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Jordan v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Tucker v. Park Yarn Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Simons v. . LebrunSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Hudson v. Singleton Silk Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Keith v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Haga v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API