State v. . Hoover
Supreme Court of North Carolina
CRIMINAL action, tried before Meares, J., at August Term, 1890, of Mecklenburg Criminal Court. Appeal by defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
The contract, as testified to by the prosecutor, was as follows: “Jackson was to cultivate certain of the prosecutor’s land, amounting to about eight or nine acres, for the year 1890, and pay him as rental the sum of $33, or one 400-pound bale of cotton, with the understanding that Jackson was to work for the prosecutor whenever he needed Jackson, and he (Jackson) could leave his own crop, at fifty cents a day.”
We think the relation of master and servant did not exist, for the reason that Jackson was not in the employment of the prosecutor. The relation between them was- that of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Pleasants v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Angel v. Black Band Consolidated Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Minton v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Moss v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915