Legal Opinion

State v. . Hoover

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CRIMINAL action, tried before Meares, J., at August Term, 1890, of Mecklenburg Criminal Court. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The contract, as testified to by the prosecutor, was as follows: “Jackson was to cultivate certain of the prosecutor’s land, amounting to about eight or nine acres, for the year 1890, and pay him as rental the sum of $33, or one 400-pound bale of cotton, with the understanding that Jackson was to work for the prosecutor whenever he needed Jackson, and he (Jackson) could leave his own crop, at fifty cents a day.”

We think the relation of master and servant did not exist, for the reason that Jackson was not in the employment of the prosecutor. The relation between them was- that of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Angel v. Black Band Consolidated Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Minton v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Moss v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API