Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Association v. Roseman.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2019No. 2018-1439PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

*485 {¶ 1} Respondent, Darwin Richard Roseman, of Westerville, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0064756, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1995.

{¶ 2} On July 26, 2016, we suspended Roseman for one year with six months stayed on conditions for his failure to act with reasonable diligence and provide competent representation in a client's personal-injury case, his failure to reasonably communicate with that client, and his efforts to conceal the consequences of *486 his inaction. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Roseman , 147 Ohio St.3d 317 , 2016-Ohio-5085 , 65 N.E.3d 713 . Roseman has not applied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FolwellOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Columbus Bar Association v. BalaloskiOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Columbus Bar Association v. RosemanOhio Supreme Court · 2016

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Barbera (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Dougherty (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. TregreOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API